Why Japanese Hated the American M1 Garand?

Japanese infantry had tactics that worked terrifyingly well. Aggressive charges that overwhelmed defenders before they could put out enough fire to stop them. It had worked before against other armies. But when they hit American lines in the Pacific, something was very different. Charges that should have broken through were being cut apart with horrific casualties. The answer was that American soldiers had something no other army in the world had at the time. They were the first to equip every infantryman with a semi-automatic rifle.


A Soldier with the M1 Garand

The Search for a Better Rifle

When the First World War ended, military planners asked an uncomfortable question. Why were their infantry still fighting with rifles that worked basically the same way they did 50 years ago? The Americans looked at their M1903 Springfield, reliable but painfully slow when the shooting got serious, and decided they needed something better. A rifle that fired every time you pulled the trigger without manually chambering the next round.

Semi-automatic rifles weren't a new idea. Remington and Winchester had been selling them to hunters since the early 1900s. But making one work with the military's .30-06 Springfield cartridge was the problem. The round generated very high chamber pressures and used a heavy powder charge. Any rifle designed to fire it automatically had to contain all that stress without shaking itself apart. The French had tried during WWI with the RSC 1917, making about 86,000 of them. Soldiers hated it so much that many were converted back to bolt action by blocking the gas system entirely.


Then John Garand showed up at Springfield Armory in 1919. His breakthrough was a gas operated system specifically engineered for the stresses of a powerful cartridge. When fired, a small portion of gases diverted through a port into a cylinder beneath the barrel, pushing a piston that cycled the bolt, ejected the spent case, and chambered a fresh round. It distributed the energy in a controlled way and avoided overstressing any single component.

The Gas Cylinder

The rifle was formally adopted on January 9th, 1936 as the US Rifle, Caliber .30, M1. The first time any major military power standardized a semi-automatic rifle as its primary infantry weapon.


How It Worked

One of the most distinctive features was the en-bloc clip feeding system. Senior officers rejected detachable magazines because they believed soldiers would lose them. So Garand designed a fixed internal magazine fed by a stamped steel clip holding eight cartridges. You locked the bolt open, inserted the clip from the top, and pressed it down. When you fired the last round, the clip ejected upward with that distinctive metallic ping and the bolt locked open.

The clip feeding system


A trained soldier could deliver 40 to 50 accurate aimed shots per minute at 300 yards. Compare that to 10 to 15 from a bolt-action rifle. Roughly three times the practical rate of fire. That's a massive difference when bullets start flying.

The rifle weighed about 9.5 pounds empty, closer to 11 with a full clip, sling, and bayonet. Soldiers complained about the weight, which is a big reason the lighter M1 Carbine was developed for support roles.


The most infamous quirk was Garand thumb, where the bolt could snap forward and catch your thumb during loading. It happened often enough in training to become legendary. Then there was the problem of topping off. You couldn't easily add rounds to a partially loaded clip. Your options were to eject it and lose whatever remained, or fire off the rest to empty the rifle, which wasted ammo and gave away your position.

Soldier's Thumb Injured From Loading

As for the famous ping myth, that enemy soldiers listened for the clip ejecting and rushed during the reload, in most combat conditions battle noise drowned it out completely. But in Pacific jungle fighting, where engagements sometimes happened at distances measured in feet, it might have been a different story. This is why Marines learned to work in teams so at least one rifle was always loaded.


What Japan Brought to the Fight

Japan's standard rifle was the Type 38 Arisaka, adopted in 1905 and chambered in 6.5x50mm. At about 50 inches long, it was one of the longest military rifles of the war. In 1939, the Type 99 entered service in 7.7x58mm with about 18% more muzzle energy. It was the first military rifle with a chrome-lined bore, which improved barrel life in humid jungle environments.

Japanese Soldiers with Type 38 Arisaka Rifle


But Japan never completed the transition. Both rifles remained in service simultaneously, forcing supply units to manage two incompatible ammunition types for rifles that looked almost identical. As the war dragged on, manufacturing quality collapsed. Late-war rifles used lower grade steel, dropped features like chrome lining, and showed rough finishes. You could see Japan losing the war just by looking at their rifles.

Why the Charges Stopped Working

Japanese doctrine was built around a philosophy called Seishin Kyoiku, spiritual education. The basic idea was that superior willpower and mental toughness could overcome material disadvantages. This came from their experience in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904, where aggressive tactics had defeated a larger Russian army.

Their doctrine held that the ultimate culmination of infantry combat wasn't firepower but the bayonet charge. That's why the Type 38 was so long. With a 16-inch bayonet attached to a 50-inch rifle, Japanese soldiers had significant reach in hand-to-hand fighting. The whole system was optimized for getting close and finishing the fight by hand.

This had worked in China during the 1930s against opponents with bolt-action rifles. A determined charge could overwhelm defenders before they generated enough fire to stop it. Against American forces equipped with M1 Garands, BARs, and machine guns, it was a completely different situation. The volume of fire simply shredded these attacks before Japanese soldiers could close the distance.

The Japanese Charge


Captured Japanese soldiers reportedly asked interrogators how the United States could afford to arm every single infantryman with a machine gun. That's what they thought they were facing.


Japan Tries to Copy the Garand

The Japanese knew they had a problem. In late 1943, the Imperial Japanese Navy revived its semi-automatic rifle program. After occupying Manila in 1942, they had found warehouses full of M1 rifles left behind after the surrender at Bataan. Some were shipped back to Japan, and in early 1944, engineers modified ten of them to fire 7.7mm Arisaka ammunition.

The Japanese Type 4 rifle

Results were encouraging enough to proceed with full reverse engineering. The project produced the Type 4 rifle, but serious problems emerged immediately. The standard en-bloc clip wouldn't feed reliably with different cartridge dimensions, so they switched to a fixed 10-round magazine fed by stripper clips. But the 7.7mm cartridge produced less recoil than the .30-06, meaning the bolt wasn't pushed back hard enough to reliably complete the cycle. The action would short-stroke, failing to eject spent cases or chamber the next round.



Parts for about 200 rifles were manufactured, but only around 125 were assembled. The factory was then ordered to switch to aircraft engine production, and American bombing disrupted what remained. Japan surrendered before the problems were solved. Not a single Type 4 ever saw combat.


Forty to fifty aimed rounds per minute against ten to fifteen. That was the gap the Japanese were trying to close with bayonets and willpower. Captured soldiers thought every American had a machine gun. They didn't. They had something that changed infantry warfare forever, and Japan couldn't copy it even when they had the blueprints sitting right in front of them.

Written by Andreja Rakočević, a military history writer and co-creator of the RogerRoger YouTube channel.